ASTM F 1467 : 2018
Current
The latest, up-to-date edition.
Standard Guide for Use of an X-Ray Tester (≈10 keV Photons) in Ionizing Radiation Effects Testing of Semiconductor Devices and Microcircuits
Hardcopy , PDF
English
06-09-2023
Committee |
E 10
|
DocumentType |
Guide
|
Pages |
18
|
PublisherName |
American Society for Testing and Materials
|
Status |
Current
|
Supersedes |
1.1This guide covers recommended procedures for the use of X-ray testers (that is, sources with a photon spectrum having ≈10 keV mean photon energy and ≈50 keV maximum energy) in testing semiconductor discrete devices and integrated circuits for effects from ionizing radiation.
1.2The X-ray tester may be appropriate for investigating the susceptibility of wafer level or delidded microelectronic devices to ionizing radiation effects. It is not appropriate for investigating other radiation-induced effects such as single-event effects (SEE) or effects due to displacement damage.
1.3This guide focuses on radiation effects in metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) circuit elements, either designed (as in MOS transistors) or parasitic (as in parasitic MOS elements in bipolar transistors).
1.4Information is given about appropriate comparison of ionizing radiation hardness results obtained with an X-ray tester to those results obtained with cobalt-60 gamma irradiation. Several differences in radiation-induced effects caused by differences in the photon energies of the X-ray and cobalt-60 gamma sources are evaluated. Quantitative estimates of the magnitude of these differences in effects, and other factors that should be considered in setting up test protocols, are presented.
1.5If a 10-keV X-ray tester is to be used for qualification testing or lot acceptance testing, it is recommended that such tests be supported by cross checking with cobalt-60 gamma irradiations.
1.6Comparisons of ionizing radiation hardness results obtained with an X-ray tester with results obtained with a LINAC, with protons, etc. are outside the scope of this guide.
1.7Current understanding of the differences between the physical effects caused by X-ray and cobalt-60 gamma irradiations is used to provide an estimate of the ratio (number-of-holes-cobalt-60)/(number-of-holes-X-ray). Several cases are defined where the differences in the effects caused by X-rays and cobalt-60 gammas are expected to be small. Other cases where the differences could potentially be as great as a factor of four are described.
1.8It should be recognized that neither X-ray testers nor cobalt-60 gamma sources will provide, in general, an accurate simulation of a specified system radiation environment. The use of either test source will require extrapolation to the effects to be expected from the specified radiation environment. In this guide, we discuss the differences between X-ray tester and cobalt-60 gamma effects. This discussion should be useful as background to the problem of extrapolation to effects expected from a different radiation environment. However, the process of extrapolation to the expected real environment is treated elsewhere (1, 2).2
1.9The time scale of an X-ray irradiation and measurement may be much different than the irradiation time in the expected device application. Information on time-dependent effects is given.
1.10Possible lateral spreading of the collimated X-ray beam beyond the desired irradiated region on a wafer is also discussed.
1.11Information is given about recommended experimental methodology, dosimetry, and data interpretation.
1.12Radiation testing of semiconductor devices may produce severe degradation of the electrical parameters of irradiated devices and should therefore be considered a destructive test.
1.13The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.
1.14This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.15This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
ASTM F 1892 : 2012 : R2018 | Standard Guide for Ionizing Radiation (Total Dose) Effects Testing of Semiconductor Devices |
ASTM E 1249 : 2015 : R2021 | Standard Practice for Minimizing Dosimetry Errors in Radiation Hardness Testing of Silicon Electronic Devices Using Co-60 Sources |
ASTM E 170 : 2024 | Standard Terminology Relating to Radiation Measurements and Dosimetry |
ASTM E 170 : 2020 | Standard Terminology Relating to Radiation Measurements and Dosimetry |
ASTM E 1894 : 2018 | Standard Guide for Selecting Dosimetry Systems for Application in Pulsed X-Ray Sources |
ASTM E 1249 : 2015 | Standard Practice for Minimizing Dosimetry Errors in Radiation Hardness Testing of Silicon Electronic Devices Using Co-60 Sources |
ASTM E 666 : 2021 | Standard Practice for Calculating Absorbed Dose From Gamma or X Radiation |
ASTM E 170 : 2023 | Standard Terminology Relating to Radiation Measurements and Dosimetry |
ASTM E 1894 : 1997 | Standard Guide for Selecting Dosimetry Systems for Application in Pulsed X-Ray Sources |
ASTM E 1249 : 2000 | Standard Practice for Minimizing Dosimetry Errors in Radiation Hardness Testing of Silicon Electronic Devices Using Co-60 Sources |
ASTM E 1894 : 2024 | Standard Guide for Selecting Dosimetry Systems for Application in Pulsed X-Ray Sources |
ASTM E 666 : 2014 | Standard Practice for Calculating Absorbed Dose From Gamma or X Radiation |
Access your standards online with a subscription
Features
-
Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.
-
Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.
-
Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.