ASTM C 1819 : 2021
Current
The latest, up-to-date edition.
Standard Test Method for Hoop Tensile Strength of Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Advanced Ceramic Composite Tubular Test Specimens at Ambient Temperature Using Elastomeric Inserts
Hardcopy , PDF
English
03-08-2021
Committee |
C 28
|
DocumentType |
Test Method
|
Pages |
19
|
PublisherName |
American Society for Testing and Materials
|
Status |
Current
|
Supersedes |
1.1This test method covers the determination of the hoop tensile strength including stress-strain response of continuous fiber-reinforced advanced ceramic tubes subjected to an internal pressure produced by the expansion of an elastomeric insert undergoing monotonic uniaxial loading at ambient temperature. This type of test configuration is sometimes referred to as an overhung tube. This test method is specific to tube geometries because flaw populations, fiber architecture, and specimen geometry factors are often distinctly different in composite tubes, as compared to flat plates.
1.2In the test method a composite tube/cylinder with a defined gage section and a known wall thickness is loaded via internal pressurization from the radial expansion of an elastomeric insert (located midway inside the tube) that is longitudinally compressed from either end by pushrods. The elastomeric insert expands under the uniaxial compressive loading of the pushrods and exerts a uniform radial pressure on the inside of the tube. The resulting hoop stress-strain response of the composite tube is recorded until failure of the tube. The hoop tensile strength and the hoop fracture strength are determined from the resulting maximum pressure and the pressure at fracture, respectively. The hoop tensile strains, the hoop proportional limit stress, and the modulus of elasticity in the hoop direction are determined from the stress-strain data. Note that hoop tensile strength as used in this test method refers to the tensile strength in the hoop direction from the induced pressure of a monotonic, uniaxially loaded elastomeric insert, where “monotonic” refers to a continuous, nonstop test rate without reversals from test initiation to final fracture.
1.3This test method applies primarily to advanced ceramic matrix composite tubes with continuous fiber reinforcement: unidirectional (1D, filament wound and tape lay-up), bidirectional (2D, fabric/tape lay-up and weave), and tridirectional (3D, braid and weave). These types of ceramic matrix composites can be composed of a wide range of ceramic fibers (oxide, graphite, carbide, nitride, and other compositions) in a wide range of crystalline and amorphous ceramic matrix compositions (oxide, carbide, nitride, carbon, graphite, and other compositions).
1.4This test method does not directly address discontinuous fiber-reinforced, whisker-reinforced, or particulate-reinforced ceramics, although the test methods detailed here may be equally applicable to these composites.
1.5The test method is applicable to a range of test specimen tube geometries based on a non-dimensional parameter that includes composite material property and tube radius. Lengths of the composite tube, pushrods, and elastomeric insert are determined from this non-dimensional parameter so as to provide a gage length with uniform internal radial pressure. A wide range of combinations of material properties, tube radii, wall thicknesses, tube lengths, and insert lengths are possible.
1.5.1This test method is specific to ambient temperature testing. Elevated temperature testing requires high-temperature furnaces and heating devices with temperature control and measurement systems and temperature-capable grips and loading fixtures, which are not addressed in this test standard.
1.6This test method addresses tubular test specimen geometries, test specimen methods, testing rates (force rate, induced pressure rate, displacement rate, or strain rate), and data collection and reporting procedures in the following sections.
Section | |
Scope | 1 |
Referenced Documents | 2 |
Terminology | 3 |
Summary of Test Method | 4 |
Significance and Use | 5 |
Interferences | 6 |
Apparatus | 7 |
Hazards | 8 |
Test Specimens | 9 |
Test Procedure | 10 |
Calculation of Results | 11 |
Report | 12 |
Precision and Bias | 13 |
Keywords | 14 |
Appendixes | |
Verification of Load Train Alignment | Appendix X1 |
Stress Factors for Calculation of Maximum Hoop Stress | Appendix X2 |
Axial Force to Internal Pressure | Appendix X3 |
1.7Values expressed in this test method are in accordance with the International System of Units (SI) (IEEE/ASTM SI 10).
1.8This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific hazard statements are given in Section 8 and Note 1.
1.9This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
ASTM E 83 : 2023 | Standard Practice for Verification and Classification of Extensometer Systems |
ASTM D 3878 : 2023 | Standard Terminology for Composite Materials |
ASTM E 83 : 2016 | Standard Practice for Verification and Classification of Extensometer Systems |
ASTM E 83 : 1998 : EDT 1 | Standard Practice for Verification and Classification of Extensometer |
ASTM E 337 : 2015 : R2023 | Standard Test Method for Measuring Humidity with a Psychrometer (the Measurement of Wet- and Dry-Bulb Temperatures) |
ASTM E 337 : 2015 | Standard Test Method for Measuring Humidity with a Psychrometer (the Measurement of Wet- and Dry-Bulb Temperatures) |
ASTM E 691 : 2020 | Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method |
ASTM E 691 : 2023 | Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method |
ASTM C 1239 : 2013 : R2018 | Standard Practice for Reporting Uniaxial Strength Data and Estimating Weibull Distribution Parameters for Advanced Ceramics |
ASTM E 691 : 2022 | Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method |
ASTM D 3878 : 2020 : REV B | Standard Terminology for Composite Materials |
ASTM E 6 : 2023 : REV A | Standard Terminology Relating to Methods of Mechanical Testing |
ASTM E 4 : 2021 | Standard Practices for Force Calibration and Verification of Testing Machines |
ASTM E 691 : 2021 | Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method |
ASTM E 6 : 2015 : EDT 4 : REDLINE | Standard Terminology Relating to Methods of Mechanical Testing |
ASTM E 6 : 2015 : EDT 4 | Standard Terminology Relating to Methods of Mechanical Testing |
ASTM E 6 : 2023 | Standard Terminology Relating to Methods of Mechanical Testing |
ASTM E 4 : 2024 | Standard Practices for Force Calibration and Verification of Testing Machines |
ASTM C 1239 : 2013 : R2024 : EDT 1 | Standard Practice for Reporting Uniaxial Strength Data and Estimating Weibull Distribution Parameters for Advanced Ceramics |
Access your standards online with a subscription
Features
-
Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.
-
Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.
-
Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.