CLSI EP31 A : 1ED 2008
Superseded
A superseded Standard is one, which is fully replaced by another Standard, which is a new edition of the same Standard.
View Superseded by
VERIFICATION OF COMPARABILITY OF PATIENT RESULTS WITHIN ONE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
31-03-2023
12-01-2013
Abstract
Committee Membership
Foreword
1 Scope
2 Introduction
3 Standard Precautions
4 Definitions
5 Practical Considerations for Designing a Comparability
Monitoring Protocol
5.1 Causes of Noncomparability of Results
5.2 Scope of Comparisons
5.3 Risk Assessment for Noncomparable Results
5.4 Frequency and Complexity of Comparability Assessment
Protocols
5.5 General Approaches to Comparability Testing
5.6 Triggers for Special Cause Comparability Testing
6 Samples for Comparability Testing
6.1 Commutability
6.2 Analyte Concentrations for Testing
6.3 Storage and Transport
7 Acceptance Criteria for Comparability Testing of Patient
Results
7.1 Evaluation of Comparability Based on Clinical Outcomes
7.2 Evaluation of Comparability Based on Clinician's
Questionnaire
7.3 Evaluation of Comparability Based on Biological Variability
7.4 Evaluation of Analytical Performance Based on Published
Professional
7.5 Evaluation of Analytical Performance Based on Goals Set
by Accrediting Agencies
7.6 Evaluation of Analytical Performance Based on the General
Capability
8 Statistical Evaluation of Comparability Data
8.1 Hypothesis Testing
8.2 Statistical Analysis of Comparability Data
8.3 Fixed Limit Evaluation
9 Point-of-Care Testing (POCT)
9.1 Specimen Selection
9.2 Specimen Acquisition
9.3 Range of Specimen Values
9.4 Multiple Devices of the Same Make and Model
9.5 Statistical Considerations for POC Comparability
Testing
10 Range Test Comparability Protocol
10.1 Select an Analyte for Comparison
10.2 Select the Instruments to Be Compared
10.3 Identify an Approximate Analyte Concentration for
Comparison Testing
10.4 Calculate the Desired Concentration or Activity to Be
Used for Comparison Sample Selection
10.5 Select a Sample for Comparison Testing
10.6 Select the Appropriate Level of Acceptance Criteria
That Can Be Applied to the Comparison Test (from
Section 7)
10.7 Set the Critical Difference for the Comparability
Test at the Recommended Total Error or Bias Limit
Determined in Section 10.6
10.8 Determine the Number of Replicates to Be Run
10.9 Perform the Comparison
10.10 Evaluate the Clinical Relevance of the Comparison
Results
10.11 Troubleshooting Noncomparability
References
Appendix A - Worked Examples
Appendix B - Table of Critical Differences (%) for the
Range Test
Appendix C - Statistical Concepts
Appendix D - Biological Variation
Summary of Comments and Subcommittee Responses
The Quality Management System Approach
Related CLSI Reference Materials
Describes guidance on how to verify comparability of quantitative laboratory results for individual patients within a health care system.
DevelopmentNote |
Supersedes NCCLS C54 P. (06/2008) Interim Revision of 1ED 2008 issued on 22/08/2012. (01/2013) Formerly CLSI C54 A. (07/2013)
|
DocumentType |
Miscellaneous Product
|
PublisherName |
Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute
|
Status |
Superseded
|
SupersededBy | |
Supersedes |
CLSI EP19 : 2ED 2015 | A FRAMEWORK FOR USING CLSI DOCUMENTS TO EVALUATE CLINICAL LABORATORY MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES |
CLSI EP26 A : 1ED 2013 | USER EVALUATION OF BETWEEN-REAGENT LOT VARIATION |
BIS IS/ISO 15189 : 2012 | MEDICAL LABORATORIES - REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALITY AND COMPETENCE |
CLSI EP27 A : 1ED 2012 | HOW TO CONSTRUCT AND INTERPRET AN ERROR GRID FOR QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSTIC ASSAYS |
I.S. EN ISO 15189:2012 | MEDICAL LABORATORIES - REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALITY AND COMPETENCE (ISO 15189:2012, CORRECTED VERSION 2014-08-15) |
CLSI POCT9 A : 1ED 2010 | SELECTION CRITERIA FOR POINT-OF-CARE TESTING DEVICES |
CLSI H26 P2 : 2ED 2009 | VALIDATION, VERIFICATION, AND QUALITY ASSURANCE OF AUTOMATED HEMATOLOGY ANALYZERS |
PREN ISO 15189 : DRAFT 2011 | MEDICAL LABORATORIES - PARTICULAR REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALITY AND COMPETENCE |
UNE-EN ISO 15189:2013 | Medical laboratories - Requirements for quality and competence (ISO 15189:2012, Corrected version 2014-08-15) |
CLSI C24 : 4ED 2016 | STATISTICAL QUALITY CONTROL FOR QUANTITATIVE MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES: PRINCIPLES AND DEFINITIONS |
CLSI NBS04 A : 1ED 2010 | NEWBORN SCREENING BY TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY<br> |
11/30173018 DC : 0 | BS EN ISO 15189 - MEDICAL LABORATORIES - PARTICULAR REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALITY AND COMPETENCE |
DIN EN ISO 15189:2014-11 | Medical laboratories - Requirements for quality and competence (ISO 15189:2012, Corrected version 2014-08-15) |
UNI EN ISO 15189 : 2013 | MEDICAL LABORATORIES - REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALITY AND COMPETENCE |
CLSI H26 A2 : 2ED 2010 | VALIDATION, VERIFICATION, AND QUALITY ASSURANCE OF AUTOMATED HEMATOLOGY ANALYZERS |
CLSI QMS24 : 3ED 2016 | USING PROFICIENCY TESTING AND ALTERNATIVE ASSESSMENT TO IMPROVE MEDICAL LABORATORY QUALITY |
CLSI EP33 : 2016 | USE OF DELTA CHECKS IN THE MEDICAL LABORATORY |
ISO 15189:2012 | Medical laboratories — Requirements for quality and competence |
BS EN ISO 15189:2012 | Medical laboratories. Requirements for quality and competence |
CLSI EP9 A3 : 3ED 2013 | MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE COMPARISON AND BIAS ESTIMATION USING PATIENT SAMPLES |
CLSI C37 A : 1ED 99 | PREPARATION AND VALIDATION OF COMMUTABLE FROZEN HUMAN SERUM POOLS AS SECONDARY REFERENCE MATERIALS FOR CHOLESTEROL MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES |
CLSI EP5 A2 : 2ED 2004 | EVALUATION OF PRECISION PERFORMANCE OF QUANTITATIVE MEASUREMENT METHODS |
CLSI M29 A3 : 3ED 2005 | ACQUIRED INFECTIONS; APPROVED GUIDELINE |
CLSI EP15 A2 : 2ED 2006 | USER VERIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE FOR PRECISION AND TRUENESS |
CLSI EP32 R : 1ED 2006 | METROLOGICAL TRACEABILITY AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION |
CLSI C30 A2 : 2ED 2002 | POINT-OF-CARE BLOOD GLUCOSE TESTING IN ACUTE AND CHRONIC CARE FACILITIES |
CLSI C24 A3 : 3ED 2006 | STATISTICAL QUALITY CONTROL FOR QUANTITATIVE MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES: PRINCIPLES AND DEFINITIONS |
CLSI EP9 A2 : 2ED 2002 | METHOD COMPARISON AND BIAS ESTIMATION USING PATIENT SAMPLES |
Access your standards online with a subscription
Features
-
Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.
-
Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.
-
Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.